federal appeal lawyer


If the appellate court does not decide in your favor, we will request a rehearing from that court within 14 days of the decision. This is necessary if we believe the court’s decision was based on an issue not presented in our briefs, or the court’s opinion leaves out a material fact or issue.

Both your constitutional rights and rules of evidence prevent courts from admitting many out-of-court statements, including many confessions made by a defendant. If a statement you made was admitted to the court, we might appeal on the basis of hearsay or other legal error.

Absolutely. If you are a suspect or being investigated for potential criminal activity, it is always in your best interest to have a lawyer present. This is true regardless of where the questioning takes place. If the authorities want to question you while you are in custody, you should ask to have a lawyer present during any questioning and refuse to answer questions until your lawyer is with you.

The language and organization of the rule are amended to make the rule more easily understood. In addition to changes made to improve the understanding, the Advisory Committee has changed language to make style and terminology consistent throughout the appellate rules. These changes are intended to be stylistic only; in this rule, however, substantive changes are made in paragraphs (a) and (b), and in subdivision (c).


So, unlike trial lawyers, appeals lawyers do most of their work in writing, and they address their arguments to judges, who are lawyers, not members of the community. There are no witnesses who testify in an appeal. Being a smooth talker, or a tough guy, or knowing a judge, just does not matter much at all for an appeal.

An Appeal Is Not a New Trial. For laypeople, there are many surprises about the appellate process. The most important, and most unexpected for many people, is that an appeal is not about the facts of the case, except in the broadest sense. Appellate courts do not hear from witnesses, do not take evidence, and do not re-try the case. Instead, the job of the appellate court is to review the testimony and documents presented in the trial court to discern whether or not a legal error has been committed.

Rule 4(a) has permitted a district court to reopen the time to appeal a judgment or order upon finding that four conditions were satisfied. First, the district court had to find that the appellant did not receive notice of the entry of the judgment or order from the district court or any party within 21 days after the judgment or order was entered. Second, the district court had to find that the appellant moved to reopen the time to appeal within 7 days after the appellant received notice of the entry of the judgment or order. Third, the district court had to find that the appellant moved to reopen the time to appeal within 180 days after the judgment or order was entered. Finally, the district court had to find that no party would be prejudiced by the reopening of the time to appeal.

You may have the right to appeal your conviction and sentence, regardless of whether you were found guilty at trial or if you plead guilty. Just because you have been sentenced does not mean you must stop fighting. The federal criminal direct appeals lawyers at the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania office of The Zeiger Firm understand federal appellate law and can help you in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Many individuals want a fresh set of eyes to review their conviction to determine the appellate issues the Third Circuit Court of Appeals might consider reversing the conviction or reducing the sentence imposed by the judge. Our federal criminal direct appeals attorneys can help you.Unlike at a trial, on appeal, the issue in an appeal to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals generally is whether the trial court made a legal error that affected the verdict or the sentence in your case. If the mistake was important, the conviction or sentence may be reversed, or a new trial could be awarded. Or, if the Judge made other errors, you could be entitled to a new sentencing hearing or the sentence could be reduced. But fresh eyes can make all the difference. That is why it is so critical to hire an attorney who understands the law relating to appeals and the procedures that apply to these cases.Mr. Zeiger is also sworn in to the Supreme Court of the United States. If you are unhappy with the result of an appeal from any Circuit Court in the United States or any State Supreme Court decision, contact Mr. Zeiger now to learn more information on file a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States.At The Zeiger Firm, we represent individuals seeking new counsel to their handle Federal court appeals in Pennsylvania. Our criminal defense attorneys are zealous advocates who have represented many persons in appeals from their convictions and sentences.When you need a Pennsylvania criminal defense attorney to represent you in an appeal from a sentence or conviction in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, contact The Zeiger Firm, where our goal is to represent every client zealously and to obtain the best results possible in each case. To arrange a consultation, please give us a call at 215-546-0340 or send us an email via the form below.

If a client loses in the Second Circuit, he or she has the right to seek review by the Supreme Court of the United States. However, the Supreme Court takes only a few very important cases for review every year. If counsel files a “petition for writ of certiorari,” which asks the Court to consider a case, and if “cert” is granted, the Supreme Court will make the final decision in the case. If “cert” is denied, the Second Circuit’s decision will stand.

All of this is to say that, instead of being a smooth talker, or a tough guy, or having connections to the judge, appeals lawyers need to be studious, creative, and excellent legal writers. Many trial lawyers do not like to study, research, and write. They may prefer the drama and the limelight of trials or making impassioned pleas to juries. They often thrive on their ability to “wing it.” Working on appeals, however, is mostly reading, researching, and writing in an office. It is not glamorous. It can be very tedious. That is probably why many trial lawyers do not handle appeals.

For defendant, Jones, who contends he is innocent, and for Ramirez, their only recourse now to avoid execution is an appeal to the governor of Arizona for clemency. They have run the course of their appeals and come up short. So too will many others.

Usually, the family knows that their loved one has been charged with a crime, but they may not know a lot about what has been happening with the case. They are hoping and praying that the case will turn out well, but then, suddenly, almost without warning, they learn that their loved one has just been sentenced to serve many years in prison. They are angry, scared, and upset. How could this happen? Why didn’t we know? What can we do now? When will he be able to come home? These are the questions I am regularly asked.

How are attorney fees paid? In criminal cases, we usually charge a flat rate for everything but trial and a trial fee that is only owed if the case goes to trial. A flat fee means that, no matter how much work the lawyer has to do, you know up front what the fee is going to be. We base our fees on our estimate of the amount of time and work that will be required to defend the case. We are not a factory type of operation, so we generally do not have “grocery store” pricing, in which a given crime costs a set amount regardless of the facts. Each case is different, and we try to tailor our fees to your individual case. That means that we want to find out about your case and that we try to set our fees based on how much work we think your case will take and how complicated it will be.If you are under investigation, but you have not been charged, we may offer to represent you during the investigation based on an hourly rate with a cost deposit that we bill against. This can benefit you because it can be difficult to predict how much work it will take to represent someone during an investigation, and an hourly rate means that you will only pay for the work done.

The Process Although some cases are decided based on written briefs alone, many cases are selected for an “oral argument” before the court. Oral argument in the court of appeals is a structured discussion between the appellate lawyers and the panel of judges focusing on the legal principles in dispute. Each side is given a short time — usually about 15 minutes — to present arguments to the court. Most appeals are final. The court of appeals decision usually will be the final word in the case, unless it sends the case back to the trial court for additional proceedings, or the parties ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case. In some cases the decision may be reviewed en banc, that is, by a larger group of judges (usually all) of the court of appeals for the circuit. A litigant who loses in a federal court of appeals, or in the highest court of a state, may file a petition for a “writ of certiorari,” which is a document asking the Supreme Court to review the case. The Supreme Court, however, does not have to grant review. The Court typically will agree to hear a case only when it involves an unusually important legal principle, or when two or more federal appellate courts have interpreted a law differently. There are also a small number of special circumstances in which the Supreme Court is required by law to hear an appeal.  Different types of cases are handled differently during an appeal. Civil Case Either side may appeal the verdict. Criminal Case The defendant may appeal a guilty verdict, but the government may not appeal if a defendant is found not guilty. Either side in a criminal case may appeal with respect to the sentence that is imposed after a guilty verdict. Bankruptcy Case An appeal of a ruling by a bankruptcy judge may be taken to the district court. Several courts of appeals, however, have established a bankruptcy appellate panel consisting of three bankruptcy judges to hear appeals directly from the bankruptcy courts. In either situation, the party that loses in the initial bankruptcy appeal may then appeal to the court of appeals. Appeals are decided by panels of three judges working together. The appellant presents legal arguments to the panel, in writing, in a document called a “brief.” In the brief, the appellant tries to persuade the judges that the trial court made an error, and that its decision should be reversed. On the other hand, the party defending against the appeal, known as the “appellee,” tries in its brief to show why the trial court decision was correct, or why any error made by the trial court was not significant enough to affect the outcome of the case. Other Types of Appeals A litigant who is not satisfied with a decision made by a federal administrative agency usually may file a petition for review of the agency decision by a court of appeals. Judicial review in cases involving certain federal agencies or programs — for example, disputes over Social Security benefits — may be obtained first in a district court rather than a court of appeals.

With an appeal in Atlanta federal court, you can seek to overturn the conviction against you. An appeal can be based upon errors at the trial court level, problems with the jury, and much more. Only a specific analysis of a defendant’s particular case can determine what grounds may exist for a successful appeal.

March 9, 2020 – Second Circuit Calendars – The regular argued appeals and motions calendars will be heard as scheduled at the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. A lawyer or pro se party scheduled to argue is directed to contact the Clerk of Court at 646.584.2696 if she or he has* visited China, Iran, Italy, Japan or South Korea within the last 14 days,

The process to file an appeal in an appellate court can be complicated and is governed by strict rules. Any failure to abide by these rules can result in dismissal of an appeal, and may mean that a defendant is not able to overturn their conviction, even if it is warranted. Deadlines are strictly enforced. If a defendant wishes to appeal their conviction, the assistance of a knowledgeable federal appeals lawyer in the area could be crucial.

Since this subdivision governs appeals in all civil cases, it supersedes the provisions of section 25 of the Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C. §48). Except in cases to which the United States or an officer or agency thereof is a party, the change is a minor one, since a successful litigant in a bankruptcy proceeding may, under section 25, oblige an aggrieved party to appeal within 30 days after entry of judgment—the time fixed by this subdivision in cases involving private parties only—by serving him with notice of entry on the day thereof, and by the terms of section 25 an aggrieved party must in any event appeal within 40 days after entry of judgment. No reason appears why the time for appeal in bankruptcy should not be the same as that in civil cases generally. Furthermore, section 25 is a potential trap for the uninitiated. The time for appeal which it provides is not applicable to all appeals which may fairly be termed appeals in bankruptcy. Section 25 governs only those cases referred to in section 24 as “proceedings in bankruptcy” and “controversies arising in proceedings in bankruptcy.” Lowenstein v. Reikes, 54 F.2d 481 (2d Cir., 1931), cert. den., 285 U.S. 539, 52 S.Ct. 311, 76 L.Ed. 932 . The distinction between such cases and other cases which arise out of bankruptcy is often difficult to determine. See 2 Moore’s Collier on Bankruptcy 24.12 through 24.36 . As a result it is not always clear whether an appeal is governed by section 25 or by FRCP 73 (a), which is applicable to such appeals in bankruptcy as are not governed by section 25.

The reason I am so proud of my work on the Christophersen case is because the United States Supreme Court considered the expert testimony issues from Christophersen less than two years later, in a landmark case called Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 . In Daubert, the Supreme Court adopted the same approach that Judge Clark advocated in his concurrence. Daubert is now taught in law schools, and courts regularly hold hearings known as Daubert hearings.

The Civil Rules require the filing of postjudgment motions “no later than 10 days after entry of judgment”—rather than “within” 10 days—to include postjudgment motions that are filed before actual entry of the judgment by the clerk. This rule is amended, therefore, to use the same terminology.

An experienced federal appeals attorney help people reverse wrongful convictions and reduce sentences in federal cases. The federal appeals attorneys at our firm are admitted to the United States Supreme Court, and our appeal lawyers have argued appeals in many different federal circuits courts, including the Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits. (Our main office is across the street from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.)

A direct appeal of a federal conviction or sentencing begins with the filing of the notice of appeal by a qualified federal appeals attorney within two weeks of sentencing. The defendant, now called the “appellant,” must soon thereafter file a brief with the clerk of the U.S. Court of Appeals. This document explains to the court the procedural history of the case in the trial court, the relevant facts of the case, the legal and factual findings of the trial court, and, most importantly, the legal arguments justifying the request to reverse the sentencing. The government must then respond by filing an opposing brief and one further brief may be filed by each party responding to the other’s arguments. At this point, the briefs will be sent to a panel of three federal judges for their review. Occasionally lawyers for each side will be called for “oral argument” before the panel, but more often appeals are decided solely on the basis of the briefs.

Writing for the three dissenters, Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the decision “perverse,” and “illogical.” The Sixth Amendment “guarantees criminal defendants the right to effective assistance of counsel at trial,” she said. “Today, however, the court hamstrings the federal courts’ authority to safeguard that right.”

The primary task of a federal criminal appeals attorney is to write a brief for the client. A federal criminal appeal differs from  a trial because there is no new evidence and likely no public hearing. Instead the primary focus of a federal criminal appeal is the brief. The brief is a long, written argument that explains why the district court erred and why the client should receive a new trial, a new sentencing hearing, or be acquitted of the criminal charge.

If you want to find out the status of your appeal, you can check the status by logging into your case on the EEOC Public Portal once you have registered and created an account. Or, you can contact the EEOC Call Center at 669-4000. Please have your ten-digit EEOC appeal number when you call to make it easier for us to serve you.

Gainesville Criminal Defense Lawyer > Florida Federal & State Criminal Appeal Lawyer Florida Federal & State Criminal Appeal Lawyer Although the judicial system was created to obtain justice, occasionally this system does fail. When that happens the Law Offices of Gilbert A. Schaffnit are here, offering 30 years of experience in helping our clients exercise their constitutional right to appeal a verdict or sentence in state and federal appeals courts. A criminal appeal is one filed after a person has been convicted of a crime. Those convicted of criminal charges generally have a right to appeal a verdict or sentence. However, some criminal appeals rights are typically waived upon the acceptance of a plea bargain. Therefore, it is imperative to discuss your appeals rights with an experienced Florida federal & state criminal appeals lawyer as soon as possible. Our Gainesville, Florida office works to preserve your interests throughout the criminal appeals process. We will review the necessary paperwork in the case to determine the best manner in which to appeal. Once our law office determines the legal arguments for an appeal, we will create a comprehensive brief which analyzes the facts of your case in terms of the applicable laws. Because we have handled numerous criminal appeals, we have a clear understanding of how to create an effective appellate brief and how to present appeals arguments both State and Federal appellate courts. If you believe that your trial proceeded in an unfair manner and that you have cause to appeal the decision, contact Mr. Schaffnit to discuss appealing your case. Before a person decides to file an appeal, it is always a good idea to consult with a skilled Florida criminal defense attorney who has extensive criminal appeal experience. To be effective the appeal must provide sound arguments at a level of legal reasoning that requires proper legal training and experience. We know how to prepare a strategic appeal that will increase our client’s chances of success. The Law Offices of Gilbert A. Schaffnit Effective Criminal Appeal Lawyer in Gainesville, Florida If you or a loved one need assistance with a criminal appeal in Florida, do not hesitate to call The Law Offices of Gilbert A. Schaffnit at 352-505-1799. At the Law Offices of Gilbert A. Schaffnit, a Florida Federal/State appeals lawyer will help you make effective decisions that will greatly impact the outcome of your case. Our offices are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and we are fully prepared to provide you with aggressive and reliable legal representation and defense. Share This Page: Gilbert A. Schaffnit View Attorney Profile Our Areas of Practice Child Pornography Computer & Internet Crime Drug Crime Federal Crimes Fraud Defense Juvenile Crime Sex Offenses Involving Minors Post Conviction Probation Modification Probation Violation Sealing or Expungement Sexual Assault Sex Offender Registration Theft Violent Crime Weapons Charge White Collar Crime Sex Offender Registry Removal

First, obviously, you want someone who has expertise in handling appeals. Why? Because an appeals lawyer knows the kinds of arguments that can work on appeal. An appeal is not like a second opinion. You are not just trying to convince the appeals judges that the trial court case should have come out differently. You have to do more than that. The law says that, even if the appeals court judges would have decided the case differently than the jury, they must uphold the jury’s verdict if any reasonable jury could have come to that conclusion, or unless there was a legal error that affected the fairness or the likely outcome of the trial. This means that the kinds of arguments that might work at trial probably will not work on appeal.

If they offer me a plea bargain, should I take it? Any offer or plea bargain should be evaluated carefully with the assistance of an experienced criminal defense lawyer to ensure that your rights have been protected and that you understand the consequences of the plea. A good criminal defense lawyer will evaluate and discuss with you your other options, including trying to have the case dismissed, your chances if you go to trial, and whether a better deal can be negotiated. This kind of analysis requires experience and knowledge of the law.

The 150-day cap properly balances these two concerns. When an order is not set forth on a separate document, what signals litigants that the order is final and appealable is a lack of further activity from the court. A 60-day period of inactivity is not sufficiently rare to signal to litigants that the court has entered its last order. By contrast, 150 days of inactivity is much less common and thus more clearly signals to litigants that the court is done with their case.

We represent clients from across the United States. We appeal civil federal cases in all 11 circuits. Our federal appeal lawyers invite you to discuss your appeal with us. Contact our qualified federal appeals attorneys to discuss the case, review top legal cases, and review the federal appeal process.

For these reasons, the Committee amended subdivision (B) so that the 7-day deadline will be triggered only by notice of the entry of a judgment or order that is served under Civil Rule 77(d). (Corresponding changes were made to the Committee Note.) The Committee does not believe that the amendment needs to be published again for comment, as the issue of what type of notice should trigger the 7-day deadline has already been addressed by commentators, the revised version of subdivision (B) is far more forgiving than the published version, and it is highly unlikely that the revised version will be found ambiguous in any respect.

Notes (As amended Mar. 10, 1986, eff. July 1, 1986; Apr. 24, 1998, eff. Dec. 1, 1998.) Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1967 Subdivision (a). The basic requirement of membership in the bar of the Supreme Court, or of the highest court of a state, or in another court of appeals or a district court is found, with minor variations, in the rules of ten circuits. The only other requirement in those circuits is that the applicant be of good moral and professional character. In the District of Columbia Circuit applicants other than members of the District of Columbia District bar or the Supreme Court bar must claim membership in the bar of the highest court of a state, territory or possession for three years prior to application for admission (D.C. Cir. Rule 7). Members of the District of Columbia District bar and the Supreme Court bar again excepted, applicants for admission to the District of Columbia Circuit bar must meet precisely defined prelaw and law school study requirements (D.C. Cir. Rule 7 1/2). A few circuits now require that application for admission be made by oral motion by a sponsor member in open court. The proposed rule permits both the application and the motion by the sponsor member to be in writing, and permits action on the motion without the appearance of the applicant or the sponsor, unless the court otherwise orders. Subdivision (b). The provision respecting suspension or disbarment is uniform. Third Circuit Rule 8 is typical. Subdivision (c). At present only Fourth Circuit Rule 36 contains an equivalent provision. The purpose of this provision is to make explicit the power of a court of appeals to impose sanctions less serious than suspension or disbarment for the breach of rules. It also affords some measure of control over attorneys who are not members of the bar of the court. Several circuits permit a non-member attorney to file briefs and motions, membership being required only at the time of oral argument. And several circuits permit argument pro hac vice by non-member attorneys. Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1986 Amendment The amendments to Rules 46(a) and (b) are technical. No substantive change is intended. Committee Notes on Rules—1998 Amendment The language and organization of the rule are amended to make the rule more easily understood. In addition to changes made to improve the understanding, the Advisory Committee has changed language to make style and terminology consistent throughout the appellate rules. These changes are intended to be stylistic only.